Andrew Strauss considers applying to become England managing director

Andrew Strauss considers applying to become England managing director

by Andy Wilson
Cricket news, scores and fixtures

• Andy Flower's former captain could become his boss
• Angus Fraser also in the running for England job

Andrew Strauss has confirmed for the first time that he has considered the possibility of applying to succeed Hugh Morris as the managing director of the England and Wales Cricket Board. Even if he does not apply, Strauss may be offered an alternative route into administration with his former county, Middlesex, if Angus Fraser, the former England seamer who is currently their managing director of cricket, is appointed by the ECB.

Fraser has been non-committal when asked about the possibility of succeeding Morris, who announced immediately after the fifth Ashes Test at The Oval last month that he will be leaving the ECB after almost seven years to return to his old club, Glamorgan, as chief executive.

The ECB advertised the position, which was created after the Schofield Report of 2007, stipulating that international playing experience is necessary.

Strauss has taken a year to assess his options since retiring as a player late last summer, was immediately linked with the job. "I'm looking into it," he confirmed in an interview to promote the Chance to Shine charity. "They're decisions that need to be made over the next couple of weeks and I'll think quite long and hard about whether it's the right time and the right job for me.

"One of the things you've got to be very careful with when jobs like these become available is to understand the actual job properly. I've obviously seen Hugh Morris do parts of his job but not the whole job."

The 36-year-old has had some involvement with the ECB this year and has also dipped his toe into the media with a Sunday newspaper column and as a summariser for Sky. But succeeding Morris now would mean that Andy Flower, with whom he worked so closely and effectively as England captain and team director respectively, becomes answerable to Strauss – which could be an uneasy position for both.

Suggestions that Flower could move upstairs to Morris's position have been scotched by the confirmation that he will definitely continue in charge of the England team for this winter's Ashes tour – and it would be a major surprise if he does not stay on for next summer's home series against India, with 2015 still seeming the most suitable time for him to hand over to the one-day coach, Ashley Giles, after the World Cup in Australia and New Zealand.

So Fraser looms as a credible alternative to both Strauss and Flower for the ECB. The 48-year-old has held a range of positions since retiring in 2002 and has won admiration for re-establishing Middlesex in Division One of the County Championship.

Elsewhere the Glamorgan seamer Simon Jones has announced his retirement from first-class and List A cricket a day after his fellow 2005 Ashes winner Matthew Hoggard. Jones, 34, will, however, continue to be available for Twenty20 contracts after his current deal expires at the end of the season.

ECB
Andrew Strauss
England cricket team
Cricket
Andy Wilson

The future of cricket coaching: jargon, management-speak and pop science?

The future of cricket coaching: jargon, management-speak and pop science?

Dress it up all you want, but just make sure you watch the ball, keep your head still and hit the thing when it's under your nose

Neil D'Costa, known for the years he has spent coaching Michael Clarke as well as for his work with Phil Hughes and Mitchell Starc, gave a barbed little interview to the Sydney Morning Herald recently, pointing out various "fundamental flaws" in the "non-negotiable basics" of Australia's top order.

Such is the depth of Australia's trauma, another filleting with the knives of the press barely registered, although D'Costa had a few hurtful zingers in his armoury. Yet this was a piece that could be read another way, too, because it was a story that said something about modern coaching.

We are about to enter the second age of the coach. The professional game is reaching an apex of analysis as science reveals more of the physical realities of batting and bowling. It's not quite golf – yet – but it will be one day. As players become highly priced freelance contractors, why wouldn't they employ a personal coach to micro-manage each aspect of their game? And why would those coaches not become high-earning mini-celebs in their own right? Golf after all has its swing gurus and its putting specialists, its mind-managers and its conditioning champions.

As in golf, a new language is developing to describe function and form, a mix between management-speak and pop-science. D'Costa's piece is studded with it: he talks about "kinetic flow" and the "entry and exit points" of various shots. Yet at heart, this new language is another way of analysing principals that are as old as the game.

D'Costa offers this jargon-heavy paragraph on David Warner: "Warner has what in swing mechanics is called a reverse swing. His weight is distributed as if he's a right-handed batsman facing the wicketkeeper. The shoulder facing the bowler is high when, in fact, it should be lower at the time the ball is released. That would enable Warner to enter his shots with the correct weight shift and put his nose over the little toe on his front foot. What I see is Warner's leaning back. That allows him to cut easily but, when he comes forward, his balance is off. Having too much weight leaning back also makes him susceptible to lbw when the ball is swinging."

Or as my taciturn former coach Jim Cameron would say: "lean into the ball" (or "lean into the fucking ball" – he was Australian) .

D'Costa on Shane Watson: "Watson has a similar shoulder angle and alignment problem to Warner. He shifts his weight back when he sets up. Watson is a big build, so it's worth comparing him to Kevin Pietersen or Jacques Kallis, who each get their front shoulders down and stand slightly open at release so they can lean into the ball, chin-forward."

Or, get your head over the the ball.

On Brad Haddin: "You cannot recalibrate your judgment if you move your head and Haddin moves his head around, both when he's batting and wicketkeeping. Like Khawaja, he drops head when batting and keeping, losing milliseconds of vision."

Keep your head still.

On Usman Khawaja: 'He breaks rule No1 – keep your head still. He's tracking the ball by dropping his head. After his dismissal in the second innings of the fourth Test, Nasser Hussain asked 'How did he miss that?' The answer is, he dropped his head before the ball arrived and was looking at the ground instead of the ball. Until he changes that habit and is able to track the ball in and out with his head still, the rest doesn't matter.'

Watch the ball.

We're at a juncture, as the late Bob Woolmer pointed out in the title of his magesterial book, of the Art and Science of Cricket. The fundamental principals of the game have been known to every player since the age of Grace. Science is, at the moment, engaged in explaining why the art works. It has value, and as the demands of its formats drive further, richer evolution of its methods, it will have a widening area of study.

But the oldest lessons should always be learned first, and they don't need decorating. Watch the ball. Keep your head still. Hit it when it's under your nose. The song remains the same.

• This is an article from our Guardian Sport Network

• This article first appeared on The Old Batsman

• Follow The Old Batsman on Twitter

Ashes 2013
Cricket
The Ashes
England cricket team
Australia cricket team
Australia sport
Jon Hotten